Over the last few years I have been watching the conversation and information about the needs of electronic health information and electronic medical records on a national scale. The information so far seems very promising and feasible, but I am worried that with the rush to implement, we as a nation above may seem to some items that I feel is the necessary safety and security protocols.

Currently, if a person becomes a victim of medical identity theft they have a lot to “prove” to do before people will help them, moreover, there is plenty of evidence that there even after the hospital and the creditors have been met from the drug, there are long-term dangers of information ” polluted “.

When someone is the victim of identity theft medical care is provided, an entry is made, and claims filed with insurance payers. In the electronic-paced world of each entity will make an entry into the system more universal in nature. While this can really help in the delivery of appropriate care, can also assist in the delivery of inappropriate care that could result in long-term injury and death.

While there are several system providers capable of providing the type of “patient profile” based on previous claims data. If data is compromised between the real patient data and co-mingled with the data from the patient “false” [those who used other people insurance information], the provider tries to give no one cares no sound of voices-in emergency situations may actually rely on information that does not accurately represent the people in their emergency rooms.

Over the last few months I have heard and read in which executives from several companies who talk down about the safety protocols and health / wellness mitigation record as nothing more than obstacles and barriers to improve the delivery of health information. I believe this to be self-serving and dishonest for several reasons:

Read the rest of this entry »